Ignorance and acceptance doom Democracy.
Ignorance and acceptance are in evidence throughout our land today.
We may well be in the twilight of the American era, as many claim.
But this need not be the ignominious end of the greatest experiment in self-government that the world has seen.
It is not too late, perhaps never too late, to pull back from the brink as long as We the People retain the vote.
In any analysis, in this Democracy, the people do retain the ultimate measure of control: They can freely and regularly change the direction and composition of their government without firing a shot, by simply casting a ballot.
The unlikely, virtually impossible, election of Donald Trump to the Presidency, is the purest proof Democracy, though perhaps in shambles, still survives.
Trump’s election represented a rejection of business as usual.
It does not matter that Hillary Clinton won more votes.
Trump captured the White House via the standard established procedure.
To do so, he garnered enough votes from the thoroughly disgusted, the downtrodden, the masses, to defeat the untrenched political-economic power structure. He was the ultimate loose cannon, but also the ultimate outsider.
Combine his votes with those of the Green Party and Bernie Sanders’ supporters and those so discouraged or hopeless that they simply stayed home, and you begin to see the true potential of an uprising, a return to power, of We the People.
The revolt need not be violent. In fact, violence always is counterproductive. No matter if the Tree of Liberty from time to time needs the Blood of Patriots as fertilizer. Dumb wars in dumber distance places have spilt more than enough Blood of Patriots. The Tree is well-fertilized.
Ballots are far more powerful than bullets.
The most recent election proved that indisputably.
Trump won with an unlikely coalition, but one that clearly demonstrated the power of an aroused and unhappy electorate.
That electorate has good reason to be unhappy.
The greed that undermines Democratic self-government is evident in every facet of American life.
The lie that unregulated free enterprise will always act in the best interests of the people has seldom been more obvious. The only reasonable check on unmitigated greed, unionization, has been crushed.
In reality, unregulated free enterprise is the handmaiden of the unscrupulous, as has been abundantly evidenced throughout the American experience. Count the scandals. Those who downplay the reality are lying. The proof is evident in the history.
Special interests, those who seek to pervert government toward their own ends, toward the fulfillment of their unique needs and desires, also are enemies of true Democracy. They seek special privilege at the expense of others.
Those who seek power for power’s sake also are enemies of Democracy. They cannot serve multiple masters, and if power is their primary God, then by necessity they must worship at the altar of the special interests, those who seek to buy their influence to advance their own desires at the expense of others.
Think of the financial industry. Insurance. Oil. Gas. Coal. Pharmaceuticals. There is an endless list of monied interests always seeking more at the expense of someone else.
I have most reluctantly come to believe that free enterprise, as practiced today, is the ultimate enemy of Democratic self-government.
First, it is not free, in any sense.
Second, the monetary rewards tilt far too disproportionately, greedily, to professional managers whose interest benefits from maximizing profit at the expense of workers.
Certain things need to happen to restore the foundation supporting Democracy.
First, citizens need to vote in their self-interest. Not what monied special interests tell them is their self-interest, but rather in what they determine to be their self-interest. They must shoulder their responsibility to determine exactly what that self-interest is, in terms of their individual needs and desires, but also in terms of the needs and desires of the larger social-economic-political structure. Education? Healthcare? The environment? Trade? Defense? Social Security?
Second, Democracy requires citizen legislators. There is no place in Democratic self-government for professional politicians who brag about “serving” the people for 15, 20, 25, 30 years.
They have been bought and paid for many times over by those funding their campaigns. They have been seduced by power and the corruption that shadows it.
Third, there can be no place for unlimited, unrestricted money in politics. Unlimited, unrestricted campaign funds simply allow the highest bidders to buy the greatest influence … At your expense.
The solutions are within easy reach.
They are obvious.
Term limits, not just for the President, but for ALL political offices. We do not need, cannot afford, the ugly burden of professional politicians.
Do not buy the lie that government is so complex it requires professional politicians to run it. It is complex only because that is in their self-interest.
Its complexity certainly does not interfere with their inaction or their frequent vacations.
Campaign finance reform.
Limit the campaign period.
Require the media, now engorging itself on special interest ad funds, to provide free debates and policy forums.
Special interests have a right to be heard, but their ads must address issues and it must be clear it is their view and their view only.
This is not complex.
It is basic.
Ensure that the right to vote is universally recognized in this great nation _ and universally respected.
There is nothing unreasonable about requiring a voter to provide identification.
You must have identification to drive a car, purchase alcohol, collect government assistance, carry a gun.
It is patently ridiculous to claim requiring identification somehow limits or interferes with a person’s ability to exercise the most fundamental obligation in a free society.
And, finally, why should U.S. Supreme Court justices serve for life? A rational, reasonable retirement age of 75 would hardly be revolutionary.
While I doubt it would do anything to depoliticize the court, it might provide more frequent and more refreshing changes in view.
As long as professional politicians promote division at the expense of unity, it is unlikely the courts can be depoliticized.
But we know how to fix that problem: term limits.
And while we are at it, think of how wonderful it would be if, in the process of change, we could rediscover that time-honored cornerstone of Democratic self-government: COMPROMISE.
It was how this nation was founded.
And how it has managed to survive thus far.
Civility.
And compromise.